Min, Max
Statistical analysis of the sentence recognition data shows
that AutoSense OS on a Naída CI M sound processor
performs better than AutoSound on a Naída CI Q sound
processor or the AutoSense OS Off program on a Naída CI
M sound processor when tested in noise. When tested in
quiet, statistical analysis of the data shows that AutoSense
OS on a Naída CI M sound processor is no worse than
AutoSound on a Naída CI Q sound processor.
Self-Assessment Questionnaire Results
Overall subjects' responses showed higher ratings after
using AutoSense OS on a Naída CI M sound processor
for 2-3 weeks as compared to ratings or their own
processor at the beginning of the study, indicating better
acceptability of AutoSense on a Naída CI M processor.
All subjects agreed or strongly agreed that AutoSense
on a M processor is acceptable for use.
40
N
Ci Q
aída
2 l
iSt
a
S
uto
ouNd
a
Verage
S
(%)
Core
13.4
94.7
N
aída
2 l
iSt
a
S
oS
uto
eNSe
a
Verage
S
(%)
Core
31.8
92.8
Ci m
2 l
iSt
a
S
uto
eNSe
oS o
ff
a
Verage
S
(%)
Core
9.3
91.2