Advanced Bionics Naída CI Q70 Manual Instrucciones De Uso página 31

ClearVoice-Medium significantly improved speech
understanding in multi-talker babble (p< .02). Speech
understanding was no worse than the Control when
listening in quiet for both ClearVoice-Medium and
ClearVoice-High (p < .0001). Speech understanding
with ClearVoice-Low was no worse than the Control
in quiet, in speech-spectrum noise, and in multi-talker
babble (p <.001).
Table 2
Mean AzBio Sentence Scores for HiRes 120 with and
without ClearVoice
Study
Control
Group
Quiet 87.3
Speech-
Spectrum 48.0
Noise
Multi-
Talker 42.8
Babble
Preference ratings indicated that 42 out of 45 subjects
(93%) preferred ClearVoice to the Control for everyday
listening (one subject did not complete the question-
naire). The mean strength of preference for the 42
subjects who preferred ClearVoice was 7.9 (1 = weak
preference, 10 = strong preference). Of the 42 subjects
preferring ClearVoice, 22 indicated they would use it all
30
Clear-
Voice Control
Low
87.8 88.6
55.6 49.5
47.2 44.9
Clear-
Voice Control
Medium
88.3 86.8
58.2 47.7
48.1 44.9
Clear-
Voice
High
87.7
58.3
46.2