Tabla de contenido
Publicidad
with such action, including any appeal of such action. This section shall survive the
termination of this License.
13) Miscellaneous. This License represents the complete agreement concerning the
subject matter hereof. If any provision of this License is held to be unenforceable, such
provision shall be reformed only to the extent necessary to make it enforceable.
14) Definition of "You" in This License. "You" throughout this License, whether in upper or
lower case, means an individual or a legal entity exercising rights under, and complying
with all of the terms of, this License. For legal entities, "You" includes any entity that
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with you. For purposes of this
definition, "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or
management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty
percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such
entity.
15) Right to Use. You may use the Original Work in all ways not otherwise restricted or
conditioned by this License or by law, and Licensor promises not to interfere with or be
responsible for such uses by You.
This license is Copyright (C) 2003-2004 Lawrence E. Rosen. All rights reserved.
Permission is hereby granted to copy and distribute this license without modification. This
license may not be modified without the express written permission of its copyright
owner.
--
END OF ACADEMIC FREE LICENSE. The following is intended to describe the essential
differences between the Academic Free License (AFL) version 1.0 and other open source
licenses:
The Academic Free License is similar to the BSD, MIT, UoI/NCSA and Apache licenses in
many respects but it is intended to solve a few problems with those licenses.
* The AFL is written so as to make it clear what software is being licensed (by the inclusion
of a statement following the copyright notice in the software). This way, the license
functions better than a template license. The BSD, MIT and UoI/NCSA licenses apply to
unidentified software.
* The AFL contains a complete copyright grant to the software. The BSD and Apache
licenses are vague and incomplete in that respect.
* The AFL contains a complete patent grant to the software. The BSD, MIT, UoI/NCSA and
Apache licenses rely on an implied patent license and contain no explicit patent grant.
* The AFL makes it clear that no trademark rights are granted to the licensor's trademarks.
The Apache license contains such a provision, but the BSD, MIT and UoI/NCSA licenses
do not.
* The AFL includes the warranty by the licensor that it either owns the copyright or that it
586
|
Publicidad
Tabla de contenido
